Sunday, September 7, 2008

The Politics of a Developer


      I'm not here to tell you who to vote for, however if you're going to vote based on what some girl on the internet tells you you may as well listen to me. Why? Because I'm funny, that's why.


    It can be argued that there isn't much difference between the two parties. This is very true, and I myself don't affiliate myself with either. I do practice my right to vote. For all the things about our government that I disapprove of, the fact that we can vote to elect our officials is pretty cool. My grandmother's generation fought so that I can vote, therefore I take pride in the fact that I can do it.


  I mean, there really isn't a debate about which candidate is more computer savvy. Obama also supports tax breaks for companies that don't outsource. If you're voting as a developer it just isn't feasible to vote for a man who admits never being in front of a computer. However, some of you may be voting with your values, and that I can understand.


  The biggest thing that appeals to me about Obama has nothing to do with his qualifications to be president, though I think it contributes. The thing I adore is his unfailing idealism. I'll say it again unfailing idealism. Some may associate that with naiveté and inexperience, however, I maintain that it is part of the foundation of success. It's not the message of "change" that gets me. The word "Change" along with the phrase "Web 2.0" makes my ears bleed at this point. Its the idea that your dreams are possible, that hope isn't a weakness. Associating our emotions with manifesting our dreams and goals is a message I can stand behind. 


   This attitude is mistaken for weakness too often. I'm sure some of you are shaking your heads and rolling your eyes as I speak (or type). You probably think I am "young" and "just haven't learned what reality is yet"  I maintain that I have accomplished things uncharacteristic for my demographic. Why? Because I know I can.


   There are many discouraging things that come my way on a daily basis. I have failed, others have told me I will fail, and people tell me that I need to get a grip of what I am capable of. People have asked who I think I am, they don't like my attitude, they think I am loud and overly confident. I am tempted to feel sorry for myself, to make excuses on why something can't be attained. I can't afford to listen to any of these things. I can't for an instant take my eyes off my goals. Why? Because that's when I fail.


   There are a lot of mumbo jumbo books out there like "The Secret" that promote this type of thinking. The thing that they lose is it's not some "magical key to unlocking your future" and it's not some great revelation, it's been known for a long time. Thomas Jefferson said "Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude."


   Do I lose sight of this? Often. Not two months ago someone had to remind me to stop questioning myself. I'm knee deep in this project because of it (more like waist deep at this point). But, I digress, Politicians break hearts. This I know. However, the one thing I see in this candidate is the chance that someone may show the next generation something that has been lost in ours, that idealism and belief in ourselves and each other can move mountains.


   Ok, I'll get off my soap box in a hot second. However, I have to say something quick to say about Michelle. She isn't the pretty woman in the nice dress that is standing behind a great man, she's the pretty lady in the nice dress that is standing WITH a great man. When her husband speaks to her I hear something I haven't heard in a politician before, he talks to her like she's a man. By that I mean, that he addresses her as a true equal, and that's something I can admire.


   I guess this comes across as one big endorsement. On a level I suppose it is....I'm not trying to open a debate about platforms and earmarks and inexperience and whatever else is a hot button issue. I understand we all have our beliefs and I'm not challenging yours. I just can't help but admire his unwaivering belief in his own ability to affectively improve our country. That is something I would want exemplified for my (currently non-existing) children.




 



14 comments:

  1. Gotta throw around the soapbox here, but you have to admit, you asked for it :-)
    Obama and McCain both have one very significant thing in common: they are both statists; by which I mean, they both believe that people elected to office are responsible to cure all of society's ills. To this end, they will both authorize the expenditure of more and more tax dollars on inefficient government programs, which go beyond the enumerated powers of the Constitution. I know it's relatively unpopular to bring up the Constitution when talking politics, but since you mentioned that you like idealism, I'm going to venture out on a branch here. The Constitution is an enumeration of powers -- the *only* powers -- that elected officials are supposed to have. Both Obama and McCain promise things that they are Constitutionally forbidden to deliver on. The Constitution is supposed to be the supreme law of the land -- if we support candidates who are so casual about violating it, how do we expect our freedoms to be safeguarded? The only presidential candidate who really understands this is Ron Paul, but he doesn't get a place at the big-boy's table because he doesn't play nice with the other kids. Obama and McCain do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. unfailing idealism - that is a good way to put it. At a lot of old, tired institutions that is not welcome (I'm sure anyone working in software has been there), hence the he doesn't have enough experience talking point. A lot of hiring managers seem to not be buying that argument anymore, as they start to realize that new ideas are often more valuable than the old ones. Should be interesting to see where the rest of the country stands.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If I have one good piece of advice to give to any upcoming developer, its BLOG. If I have one so-so piece of advice to go along with that, it's KEEP POLITICS OUT OF YOUR PROGRAMMING BLOG.
    Its not professional to mix the two. And if you have a programming blog, professionalism should be your goal. You're not just airing your thoughts, you're creating a resume.
    Have a personal blog where you talk about your cats, car tickets, wicked drunks last Friday, and whatever other subject you want to write about. If politics is your passion outside of your profession, then have a political blog. But don't mash them all together.
    I've done it in the past; most bloggers have. Hell, I abandoned a blog because my mixing of the two resulted in comment flame wars that just don't belong anywhere near a programming blog.
    Its my opinion, feel free to take it or leave it.
    Also, Palin is everything Obama claims to be, but isn't. Nyah!

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ncloud - I love Ron Paul as well for his passion
    @alex - I agree and I think it's awesome
    @will - thanks for the feedback, however, this is hardly a professional blog. I do agree this topic is a little off the grid, but I hope I've at least related it to development a little. Hopefully my next entry on NHibernate will redeem me a bit. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. You'd think a girl with so much interaction with us would have her right to vote revoked by now!

    ReplyDelete
  6. @will... Palin is a piece of flair that someone has pinned to McCain's jacket against his will.

    ReplyDelete
  7. OBAMA 2008, thats what counts. Yes money can fix problems especially with Mr Obama's Government Transparency Plan.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm not a big Obama fan, but you bring up a good point (a positive outlook is vital for success).
    My main objection is that most people treat elections like a popularity contest... Who cares whether Obama is hotter or better spoken than McCain? I apologize in advance for sounding like an ass, but... People who don't focus on the *facts* are idiots. Don't tell me that clearly X is better than Y when you're voting based on emotions. We're talking about the President of the United States here, not a beauty contest!
    Just my 2 cents :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sara,
    Good observation that there isn't much difference between the parties. Most people get caught up in the lilliputian debate of big-end vs little-end. Country vs western. Worrying whether the emperor's beard should be long or short with nobody asking whether we should have an emperor at all.
    Also good point about the non-cynical air of Obama. Just a hint though: Bob Barr is not a cynic either, and he actually has some stuff to say besides an empty bromide of change.
    http://www.bobbarr2008.com
    For those who need a visual guide to the difference between the two parties, head on over to Titanic Deck Chairs:
    titanicdeckchairs.blogspot.com/.../visual-guide-to

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think Will needs to read this: http://xkcd.com/137/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Above idealism what I like about him is that he's pragmatic. He will take whatever idea is best regardless of where it originated. Here's a sample:
    Part 1: video.google.com/.../videoplay
    Part 2: video.google.com/.../videoplay

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh I do hope to visit some day! What a great place to work!

    ReplyDelete
  13. No road is long with good company.

    ReplyDelete